The repository pattern stands out as a widely embraced design pattern, functioning as a conceptual layer that abstracts the data store within your application.
In essence, under this pattern, direct interaction with database entities is avoided. Instead, interactions occur through a dedicated Repository class, entrusted with the sole responsibility for these operations.
Two primary approaches define this pattern:
➢ Generic Repository Interface: This method involves a foundational repository interface that all repositories must adhere to. The key advantage here lies in the establishment of a straightforward and uniform API across all repositories.
For example:
example implementation of the generic repository interface
In this methodology, both classes implement a unified interface. Consequently, some repositories may implement methods they might not require. For instance, entities not intended for deletion would still be obligated to implement the deletion method. To address this, one can mitigate the issue by segregating these methods into their respective interfaces.
➢ Repository Per Entity: True to its name, this approach establishes a distinct repository for each business entity that necessitates interaction with the data store or persistent layer.
In contrast to the Generic Repository approach, this method ensures that all repositories implement only the methods they genuinely need.
Nevertheless, maintaining a consistent API across the entire application is crucial (e.g., determining whether update and delete operations take the ID of the record or the record object, and their respective return types).
Let’s delve into an example of a Repository Per Entity repository interface.
As evident, this approach offers remarkable advantages.
Abstracted data layer: As previously highlighted, the primary strength of this pattern lies in consolidating entity logic into a singular class. This centralization of queries in a single class facilitates easy maintenance. Flexible data store switching: Another merit is the seamless ability to switch between data stores. The separation of the data layer, coupled with service classes or controllers depending on interfaces, facilitates effortless replacement of concrete classes. For instance, transitioning from MySQL to MSSQL or POSTGRES involves minimal effort; a few class refactorings ensure a smooth transition.
Despite its remarkable benefits, this pattern does come with two notable drawbacks.
- Complexity and Maintenance Challenges: The verbosity associated with this pattern can make it intricate and challenging to maintain over time. For each entity, one needs to create an interface, an implementation of the interface, and a service provider to bind the interface to the implementation. As the application and codebase expand, consistently creating these three classes for every model or database table demands considerable effort and attention.
- Bloated Service/Controller Constructors or Method Definitions: Interacting with entities through interfaces necessitates resolving them from the service container. In Laravel, this can be achieved through method definitions or programmatically with an instance of the service container. This approach can become unwieldy, particularly when dealing with a controller that relies on numerous entities.
These entities constitute just a fraction of the dependencies in the controller. Add other integration classes, such as a payment gateway, to the constructor definition, and over time, the constructor becomes bloated.
Now, the question arises: Is this pattern truly necessary in Laravel?
Considering all factors, my response is NO. Allow me to elaborate.
In a framework like Laravel, equipped with a robust data layer in the form of an ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) such as Eloquent, the repository pattern’s benefits are inherently available. What’s more, Laravel’s ORM offers the flexibility to extend and tailor it to your application’s specific needs, all without the additional complexities associated with the repository pattern.
While this assertion holds true for various modern frameworks, I’ll substantiate my argument using Laravel’s Eloquent ORM, which I regularly employ.
Here are my reasons:
- Seamless Data Store Switching: Laravel simplifies the process of switching databases effortlessly. By specifying the database driver in your env file, you can seamlessly transition between databases without breaking a sweat.
- Universal Query Builder API: Laravel provides a diverse set of robust APIs that enable you to interact with your database. These APIs include methods for crafting custom queries when the need arises.
- High Customizability: Laravel’s Eloquent is not only potent but also offers an extensive range of options for constructing a highly testable and maintainable data layer.
Some of these options include:
- Scopes: You can group specific WHERE clauses into scopes, ensuring a DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself) approach throughout your codebase.
- Marcos: Laravel offers a means to extend many of its core classes, including the Illuminate\Database\Query\Builder, through macros. We can create a macro that all our models can leverage, providing a mechanism for crafting reusable queries.
This macro becomes accessible to all models through the query method whenever needed. Now, envision a scenario where we transition from MySQL to PostgreSQL and aim to implement a full-text search. The simple solution involves refactoring this search macro, and the task is complete.
- Custom Query Builders: This feature enables extension of the Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Builder class to incorporate your personalized methods. The example below illustrates a basic custom query builder for a book model.
above is a simple example of a custom query builder for a book model.
It is advisable to adopt the practice of creating a custom query builder whenever complex raw queries containing database-specific keywords are required. This approach ensures that when switching databases, the only necessary adjustment is to refactor the custom query builders to align with the equivalent queries of the new database, simplifying the transition process.
Fill-in the form below to reach out to us with your project👇
